Sep 9, 2016 | Age of the Earth, Answers in Genesis, Historical Science, Ken Ham, Mark Masthay, Observational Science, Science |
by Mark Masthay Rounding out our Putting Observational Science to the Test series, Dr. Mark Masthay, Associate Professor and former Chair of the Department of Chemistry at the University of Dayton, presents a series of posts in which he provides a case for how...
Sep 6, 2016 | Answers in Genesis, Historical Science, Ken Ham, Observational Science, Robert Brecha, Science |
by Robert Brecha Dr. Bob Brecha continues his discussion of Ken Ham’s definition of observational science, considering the ways this definition impacts the everyday work of scientific inquiry. Few scientists would, if pressed hard, claim to be investigating “the...
Sep 2, 2016 | Answers in Genesis, Historical Science, Ken Ham, Observational Science, Robert Brecha, Science |
by Robert Brecha The second entry of our Putting Observational Science to the Test series comes from Dr. Robert Brecha, Professor of Physics and Research Director for the Hanley Sustainability Institute at the University of Dayton. In this post, Robert questions...
Aug 30, 2016 | Allen McGrew, Answers in Genesis, Historical Science, Ken Ham, Observational Science, Science, Young Earth Creationism |
by Allen McGrew Kicking off our Putting Observational Science to the Test series, Dr. Allen McGrew, Associate Professor of Geology at the University of Dayton, provides some insights on Ken Ham’s distinction between “observational” and...
Aug 26, 2016 | Answers in Genesis, Ark Encounter, Bible, Biblical Literalism, Creation Museum, Creationism, Historical Science, Inerrancy, Observational Science, Patrick Thomas, Righting America, Science, Young Earth Creationism |
by Patrick Thomas Today’s post is from Patrick Thomas, whose work has mostly been behind the screen of rightingamerica.net. Below, he considers our recent posts on inerrancy at the Creation Museum and Ark Encounter to provide an introduction to our forthcoming...
